- Associate Professor, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Director, Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada;
- Diplomate, American Board of Dermatology; Fellow, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Onco-dermatologist, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Director, Pigmented Lesion Clinic, Toronto Dermatology Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Radboud UMC, Nijmegen and Andriessen Consultants, Malden, The Netherlands Diplomate, American Board of Dermatology, Fellow, Royal College of Physicians and
- Surgeons of Canada, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Laval University, Director Melanoma and Skin Clinic, Le Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Quebec City, QC, Canada;
- Diplomate, American Board of Dermatology, Fellow, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Lynderm Research, Markham, ON, Canada
Acknowledgments and Disclosure: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this manuscript. This work was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from La Roche-Posay Canada.
All authors contributed to the development of this work and its review and agreed with its content.
Up to one out of two Canadians will develop cancer in their lifetime.1 It has been estimated that 225,800 Canadians were diagnosed with cancer in 2021.1
Approximately 30-40% of cancer patients receive radiotherapy.2 A study in Ontario on breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer showed that in the year following the cancer diagnosis, 96,003 patients received radiation therapy.2
Radiotherapy damages cancerous cells’ by directly or indirectly damaging their DNA via ionization and free-radical formation.3-5 Radiation-induced cutaneous AEs occur in up to 95% of cancer patients who will develop some form of radiodermatitis (RD).3-5 Of those with breast cancer, 87% develop RD, and concurrent anti-cancer therapies may aggravate RD in 90% of head and neck patients.4,5
RD affects the area that received irradiation, and the severity depends on the area treated, beam energy, total dose, dose per fraction, treatment schedule, and use of concomitant systemic agents. RD varies considerably in severity, course, and prognosis and can have severe sequelae that impact the quality of life (QoL) and potentially alter cancer treatment course and outcomes.3-7
Radiation treatment’s impact on QoL may be profound. A prospective study conducted from July 2017 to June 2018 using the Skindex-16 pre-and post-treatment included eighty-three cancer patients [breast cancer (49%), head and neck cancer (45%), and anal canal cancer (6%)] receiving radiation treatment.7 All patients developed RD [Grade 1 – 59%, Grade 2 – 33%, and Grade 3 – 8%].7 The median composite Skindex-16 pre-treatment was 0, and post-treatment 34, demonstrating a marked negative impact on QoL.7
RD is categorized as acute, occurring within 1 to 4 weeks of treatment, or chronic, manifesting beyond four weeks to years after treatment.4
Strategies to prevent or mitigate RD are aimed at ensuring an optimal skin condition starting before the treatment. Skincare aims to improve comfort during radiotherapy, reducing inflammation and promoting healing of skin areas affected by RD.8-12 Patients should be educated on a daily skincare regime focusing on: hygiene, moisturization, and sun avoidance and protection measures.8-13
The Canadian Skin Management in Oncology Group (CaSMO) developed an algorithm for the reduction of severity and management of acute RD, which follows previous publications from this group that addressed general oncology-treatment related cutaneous adverse events [AEs], prevention, and skin management.8,13
The CaSMO project initiated by La-Roche Posay Canada aims to improve cancer patients’ and survivors’ quality of life by offering tools for preventing and managing cancer-treatment-related cutaneous AEs.
The CaSMO panel of clinicians who treat cancer patients with radiation treatment-related cutaneous AEs developed, discussed, and reached a consensus on an evidence-based algorithm supporting prevention, treatment, and maintenance using OTC skin care measures for acute RD. The algorithm focuses on skincare measures to prevent and treat RD using prevention measures and a skincare regime involving hygiene, moisturization, and sun protection measures and products. The algorithm aims to improve patient outcomes and determine the best approach for oncology skin care programs for all stakeholders in the Canadian health care setting. These include oncologists, family practice/internal medicine physicians, dermatologists, oncology nurses, advanced practice providers (APPs), nurse practitioners (NP), physician assistants and pharmacists.
In the algorithm’s development, the panel used a modified Delphi approach following the AGREE II instrument.14,15 The modified Delphi method is a communication technique for interactive decision-making for medical projects.15 The used process was adapted from face-to-face meetings to a virtual meeting to discuss the outcome of literature searches and reach a consensus on the algorithm based on the selected literature.15,16 The virtual discussion was followed by online follow-up replacing the use of a questionnaire.15 The process entailed preparing the project, selecting the panel, and conducting systematic literature searches followed by summarizing the literature search results, grading the literature, and drafting the algorithm. On January 23, 2021, a virtual panel meeting reviewed the systematic literature review results, discussed and adopted the algorithm using evidence coupled with the expert opinion and experience of the panel. The online process was to fine-tune the algorithm and to prepare and review the publication. (Figure 1)
The CaSMO working group’s consensus on the algorithm was established as a hundred percent agreement was obtained.
A literature review included guidelines, consensus papers, and publications describing current best-practice in radiation-treatment related to cutaneous AEs that benefit from topical treatment using OTC skincare, clinical, and other research studies in the English language from January 2010 to December 2020. Excluded were articles with no original data (unless a review was deemed relevant), articles not dealing with skincare for prevention and treatment of RD, and publication language other than English. A dermatologist and a physician/scientist conducted the searches on January 3 and 4, 2021, on PubMed and Google Scholar as a secondary source of the English-language literature, using the terms:
RD; skincare and topical regimes for prevention, treatment, and maintenance of RD; QoL of patients with RD; adjunctive skincare use; education of staff and patients; communication strategies; adherence; concordance; efficacy; safety; tolerability; skin irritation.
The results of the searches were evaluated independently by two reviewers, resolving discrepancies by discussion. The searches yielded one hundred and twenty-two publications. After excluding duplicates and articles deemed not relevant for the algorithm ([n = 52] other subjects, low quality, a small number, case studies), seventy papers remained. Twenty-five review articles (including one guideline, one algorithm and, eighteen systemic literature reviews), and forty-five were clinical studies (including eighteen randomized controlled trials, eighteen clinical evaluations, and cohort studies, four randomized trials, and five other).
Radiation Dermatitis, Prevention, and Treatment
The goal of radiation therapy is either curative or palliative.3,4 It can be delivered in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting, or can be the main treatment, with or without combined systemic treatment.3,4 The multidisciplinary team guiding the patient through the radiation treatment process comprises the radiation oncologist, the radiation oncology nurse, the radiation therapist, medical physicist, and dosimetrist.3,4
Radiation therapy can be external [i.e. 3-D conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation treatment, image-guided, Thomotherapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery] or internal, such as brachytherapy, radioisotope therapy, radioimmunotherapy, and radioembolization (Table 1).17 RD is defined as a cutaneous inflammatory reaction induced by exposure to biologically effective levels of ionizing radiation.17 The mechanisms associated with a radiation induced AE include an inflammatory response and oxidative stress, which interact and promote each other.18 Inflammatory markers involved in acute inflammation secondary to ionizing radiation including IL-1, IL-6, TNF-alpha and TGF-Beta, can be expressed within hours after receiving the first radiation treatment.18 Radiation treatment exhibits biological effects within hours to weeks of exposure, through irreversible breaks of the nuclear DNA strands that cause extensive genetic damage and inhibit cells’ ability to divide and replicate.3,18 Further damage comprises structural tissue destruction, generation of reactive oxygen species, a decrease in functional stem cells, initiation of epidermal and dermal inflammation, and skin cell necrosis.3,18 Radiation damage is complex, and a variety of factors influence its severity.
|External beam radiation therapy|
|2D and 3D external radiation therapy|
|Intensity-modulated radiation therapy|
|Volumetric-modulated arc therapy|
|Image-guided radiation therapy|
|Stereotactic body radiation therapy|
|Total body irradiation|
Table 1: External beam radiation therapy
RD is generally limited to the irradiated area and depends on several factors, including the target area, dose and fractionation schedule, patient’s condition, and the use of other concomitant cancer treatments (e.g. platinum-based regimens, cetuximab, 5-fluorouracil).3,4-6,18-22
Intrinsic factors that influence the occurrence and severity of RD include demographic or patient-related characteristics.6 These include age, ethnic origin, skin type, smoking, obesity, breast size, hormonal status, presence of infection, and co-existing diseases, such as diabetes or cardiovascular disease.6,17-22
Extrinsic factors include treatment-related characteristics such as technique, dose, volume, fractionation, beam energy, use of bolus, immobilization devices, and the use of combined systemic anti-cancer therapies. Further factors comprise the clinical site of treatment, e.g., areas with skin folds [head and neck, breast and axilla].17-22
Certain drugs (e.g. platinum-based regimens, cetuximab, 5-fluorouracil) increase sensitivity to radiation treatment, causing increased cellular damage and delayed tissue repair.22 Conventional chemotherapy agents and cancer treatment with EGFR inhibitors increase the risk for severe RD (Box 1).22,23
RD is categorized as acute, occurring within 1 to 4 weeks of radiation treatment, or chronic, manifesting beyond four weeks to years after treatment (Table 2).3,4,6,18-23
|Location of the treatment field||RD may be more severe depending on the location of the treatment field i.e. sites with intertriginous skin folds such as the breast or buttocks|
|Chemotherapeutic agents||Bleomycin, cisplatin, dacarbazine, docetaxel, doxorubicin, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, methotrexate, temozolomide.|
Any radio-sensitizers or drugs that cause immune suppression
|Antibiotics and anti-tuberculosis medication||–|
|Comorbidities||Anemia, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, suppression of the immune system, connective tissue diseases, radiosensitive disorders, ataxia telangiectasia, xeroderma pigmentosa|
|Other factors||Advanced age, female sex, obesity, tobacco use, chronic sun exposure, previous breast reconstruction/implants, nutrition and hydration status, mobility status|
Box 1: Contributing factors to radiodermatitis (RD)
Table 2: Acute and chronic radiation dermatitis20
*Grades of Acute Dermatitis (CTCAE V5– common terminology criteria for adverse events (National Cancer Institute)19
Cutaneous effects of radiotherapy vary considerably in severity, course, and prognosis and can have severe sequelae that impact the quality of life and disrupt cancer treatment.7,8 The two most prevalent grading systems of RD are the RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) and CTCAE v5 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) systems. The RTOG assessment tool classifies RD from 0 [no visible signs of RD] to 4 [ulceration, bleeding, necrosis].20,21 For the present algorithm, the CTCAE v5 grading system for acute RD from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) is used. This tool has five classes from 1 [faint erythema and dry desquamation] to 5 [death] (Table 3).19,22
|CTCAE v5 – DCTD Grading||RTOG Grading|
|1||Faint erythema or dry desquamation||0||No visible change to skin|
|4||Ulceration, bleeding, necrosis (rarely) seen|
Table 3: CTCAE and RTOG grading for acute RD
Division of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis Dermatitis Radiation Grading (DCTD); Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)
Grades of Acute Dermatitis (CTCAE – common terminology criteria for adverse events (National Cancer Institute)19
A-B – Grade 1 – faint erythema and dry desquamation
C-D – Grade 2 – moderate erythema and/or edema; patchy desquamation confined to folds
E-F – Grade 3 – moist desquamation in areas other than folds and bleeding from minor trauma
Grade 4 – Life-threatening consequences; full-thickness necrosis, spontaneous bleeding; skin graft indicated
Algorithm for the Prevention and Management of Acute Rd
The CaSMO algorithm for acute RD used the mnemonic RECUR (Reliable, Efficient, Clear instructions, Understandable, Remember easily).24
A clinical algorithm’s function is to standardize and support medical decision-making, such as regulating the selection and use of treatment regimens, thereby improving adherence to evidence-based guidelines.14 The algorithms have inputs and outputs, precisely defined specific steps, and uniquely defined results that depend on the preceding steps.24 The current algorithm for the prevention and management of acute RD focused on preventing or reducing and managing RD using OTC skincare and topical treatment (Figure 2). Detailed information on the various grades of RD is given in Figure 3.
The algorithm details measures to be taken before radiation treatment which include education, avoidance of skin irritants, preventative skincare, and sun avoidance and sunscreen use; it also describes prophylactic measures to be taken when radiation starts. Finally, it describes how treatment assessment of skin condition and grading of RD should take place during treatment while the preventative measures continue.
Each section is discussed in the order as they appear in the algorithm.
|Grading||Prevention, skincare and treatment|
|Grade 1: Faint erythema or dry desquamation, possible pain|
For dry desquamation start or continue with low to mid potency TCS to decrease progression and severity of itching, burning and irritation.3
|Grade 2: Moderate to brisk erythema;|
Patchy moist desquamation mostly confined to skin folds and creases;
Moderate edema, pain
|Grade 3: Moist desquamation in areas other than skin folds and creases;|
Bleeding induced by minor trauma or abrasion, severe pain
Figure 3: RD Treatment according to presentation
Grading according to CTCAE v519
Education on Prevention and Treatment of RD
Education on the type of radiation treatment, on preventive and on treatment measures for RD is essential for both clinicians and patients.13,25 Before starting the treatment, a therapeutic relationship with the patient should be built, supporting the patients’ active participation in their cancer treatment.13 As outlined in two previous publications by the CaSMO group, a detailed discussion between the patient, treating physician, and nurse or other team members includes explaining the radiation treatment protocol, potential side effects, hospital visits, diagnostic tests, management of AEs, and prophylactic and preventative measures.8,13 It is recommended to provide the patients with details on who to contact in the early stages of RD to enable addressing the AEs as early as possible.8,13 It is recommended to support education given to patients verbally by printed or online information (Box 2).8,13
Education on general measures include avoiding skin irritants, products with an elevated pH (>7), scented products and temperature extremes.8,13 Further skin trauma should be avoided such as the use of adhesive bandages and tape, rubbing, scratching and massaging the skin within the treatment area. The patient should be recommended to wear loose fitting cotton clothing which may help avoid traumatic shearing and friction injuries.
Patients should also be recommended to use electric shavers for hair removal. Wax or other depilatory creams and pre-shave liquids and aftershave are discouraged, as they can irritate the irradiated skin.
Patients should be asked not to shave the axilla if it is within the treatment field but may continue to use antiperspirants or deodorants during radiation therapy on dry intact skin.
|Cancer Care Ontario: The Prevention and Management of Acute Skin Reactions Related to Radiation Therapy||https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/guidelines-advice/types-of-cancer/846|
|NCI: Radiation Therapy Side Effects||https://www.cancer.gov/aboutcancer/treatment/types/radiation-therapy/side-effects|
|Questions to ask your doctor about your cancer treatment||https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/questions|
|Questions on how radiation therapy works||https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/types/radiation-therapy|
|Questions about How, why and what to do during radition treatment||https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/types/radiation-therapy#RTCCSE|
|Information on skincare from CDA websites||https://dermatology.ca|
|Information on cancer treatments, cutaneous AEs, and treatments||Ruth C. The Dermatology World//December 2019|
Support system. www.aad.org/dw/
|Glossary and review on cutaneous AEs||Sauder M, et al. Skin Ther Letter 2020;(10):1-12|
|Algorithm on skincare for cutaneous AEs||Sauder M, et al. Skin Ther Letter 2021;S(3):1-10|
Box 2: Resources and information
Sun Avoidance and Sun Protection
Patients should be educated on radiation treatment-induced photosensitivity which can result in symptoms such as severe sunburn, pruritus, erythema, or edema. It should be explained that phototoxicity may occur, primarily induced by UVA exposure.8,13
Phototoxicity symptoms may appear on the exposed area within a few minutes to several hours after exposure to UV light.3-5,8,13
Patients should be educated on sun avoidance as part of a healthy lifestyle, and the use of sun-protective clothing [e.g., brim hats and sunglasses].8,13 During the course of radiation and while skin is healing the patient should keep the treatment field out of direct sunlight. 3-5,8,13 After the skin has healed, it may be more sun sensitive and therefore requires diligent protection from sunlight and tanning beds should be avoided.8,13
Most dermatologists recommend daily sunscreen of SPF 30 or higher, especially for sun-exposed areas. Special populations that are at higher risk for sun-induced toxicities and neoplasms are advised to avoid sun exposure by using para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) free UVA and UVB protection as well as sun-protective clothing.8,13 Sunscreen should be reapplied as needed (e.g. after swimming or heavy perspiration) (Box 3).
Patients may continue to swim in chlorinated pools but should rinse afterwards with a gentle cleanser followed by immediately applying a moisturizer. If RD has progressed beyond dry desquamation (CTCAE grade 1) swimming should be avoided.
|Phototoxicity and photoallergy||Photosensitivity can result in symptoms such as severe sunburn, pruritus, erythema, or edema. The two types of reactions that may occur are phototoxicity and photoallergy. UVA is primarily responsible for triggering these effects and is present throughout the day and year and is readily transmitted through window glass.|
Phototoxicity symptoms may appear on the exposed area within a few minutes to several hours after exposure to UV light.
Photoallergic reactions are less common and usually occur due to topically applied medications. They involve the immune system, and symptoms can appear immediately after sun exposure or may take longer to develop. These reactions may look like eczema and can spread to areas of the body not exposed to sunlight.
|Sun avoidance and protection||Some anticancer drugs may cause photosensitivity reactions making certain precautions necessary:|
Box 3: Information on photoprotection and sunscreen application
Assessment of Skin Condition
Upon presentation of a patient with RD, it is important to check the location, size of the affected area, erythema, dry desquamation, moist desquamation, exudate, signs of infection, and discomfort (burning, pruritus, pulling, tenderness, dryness, scaling, flaking, peeling).3-5,8,13,19 Similarly, the healthcare provider should check for the presence of fever, pain, mucosal involvement and if there are significant blood laboratory abnormalities. The clinician must establish whether the AE is possibly dangerous or life threatening such as in the case of skin necrosis, ulceration of the full thickness dermis or spontaneous bleeding,13,19 and seek urgent care via a dermatologist, or emergency room for these patients.13,19 The patient must be asked about the duration of the AE and what products were used for cleansing, moisturizing, or dressings for erosions or bullae.3-5,8,13,19
Finally, the impact of RD on the patients’ daily activities, sleeping, eating or drinking must be verified. In the context of the assessment, the date of the last radiation or chemotherapy treatment, as well as concurrent medication use (analgesic, antibiotic, antifungal) and efficacy must be verified.3-5,13,19
Skincare Using Cleansers and Moisturizers
Skincare using OTC products comprises cleansers and moisturizers (Box 4).8,13 Although evidence is lacking on the best choice of product, basic recommendations on supportive measures using OTC skincare are given in various cancer treatment guidelines and consensus papers (Table 4).3,9-13,22,23,25-33
Box 4: Criteria and application of cleansers and moisturizers
|Management of acute RD: a review of the literature and proposal for a treatment algorithm||Systematic review and algorithm||Rosenthal A, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(2):558–5673|
|The role of skincare in oncology patients.||Systematic review||Sauder MB et al. Skin Ther Letter; 2020 S Oct(10):1-128|
|Management of acute RD||Systematic review and meta-analysis||Chan RJ, et al. BMC Cancer 2014;14:539|
|Prophylaxis and management of acute RD||Systematic review||Salvo N, et al. Curr Oncol 2010;17:94–11210|
|Evidence in RD management||Critical appraisal of systematic reviews||Chan et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;84:e357–6211|
|Topical interventions to prevent acute RD in head and neck cancer patients||Systematic review||Ferreira EB, et al. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25 (3):1001–1011. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3521-712|
|Canadian skin management in oncology (CaSMO) algorithm||Algorithm||Sauder MB et al Skin Ther Letter; 2021 S (3):1-1013|
|Topical treatment of RD||Systematic review||Iacovelli NA,et al Drugs Context. 2020 jun 12;9:2020-4-7. 10.7573/dic.2020-4-7. eCollection 2020.22|
|Prevention and treatment of RD in head and neck cancer patients||Systematic review||Iacovelli NA, et al. Future Oncol. 2018;14(3):291–30523|
|Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute and late RD from the MASCC Skin Toxicity Study Group||Guidelines||Wong RK, et al. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(10):2933–2948.25|
|The use of aloe vera in cancer radiation: an updated comprehensive review.||Review||Farrugia CE, et al. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2019;35:126–130.26|
|Hyaluronic acid for treatment of RD||Systematic review||Cosentino D, Piro F. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(21):7562–7572.27|
|Topical management of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients: a systematic review.||Systematic review and meta-analysis||Haruna F, et al. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(10):5343–5353. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11960.28|
|Acute RD in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy or EGFR inhibitors||Review and consensus||Russi EG, et al. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015;96(1):167–182.29|
|Evidence-based skin care management in radiation therapy: clinical update.||Systematic review||McQuestion M. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011;27:e1–e17.30|
|Patient-rated measures of RD in breast cancer radiotherapy.||Systematic review||Schnur JB, et al. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011;34(5):529–536.31|
|RD treatment overview||Review||Hegedus F, et al. Int J Dermatol. 2017;9:909–914.32|
|Wound healing after radiation therapy||Review||Haubner F, Ohmann E, Pohl F, Strutz J, Gassner HG. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:162.33|
Table 4: Systematic literature reviews, consensus papers, guidelines and algorithms
Rosenthal and colleagues recommended a treatment algorithm for RD that included basic hygiene measures using mild soap and lukewarm water.3 A consensus paper and skincare algorithm by the CaSMO group recommended a daily skincare regime focusing on: hygiene, moisturization, sun protection, and, if applicable, camouflage products.8,13 They recommended to encourage patients to keep their skin moisturized using gentle products to prevent pruritus and xerosis.8,13
The skincare formulations used for patients with RD should be safe, effective, free of additives, fragrances, perfumes, sensitizing agents, and should have a near physiologic stratum corneum (SC) pH.8,13 To support adherence to the skincare regime, products should be cosmetically pleasant and easy to use.8,13
Evidence levels of components of topical treatments is shown in Table 5.3,8,13,26-28,34-59 A systematic review3 of topical agents for the treatment of RD reported no benefits from formulations containing aloe vera26, chamomile3,37, ascorbic acid, pantothenic acid, and trolamine.49 However, benefits or potential benefits were shown when using formulations containing hyaluronic acid (HA)27,28, 34,54 epidermal growth factor EGF3,39,51 granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), topical corticosteroids (TCS) 40-45 or statins.58
|Topical||Proposed mechanism of action||Clinical efficacy||Level of evidence|
|Gentle cleansers8,13||Cleansing, antimicrobial, hydrating||Proven useful, reduced RD symptoms||A2|
|Thermal water containing skincare regimen8||Prevention and treatment of RD, anti-inflammatory, supports a balanced skin microbiome||Potentially useful for prevention and treatment||B2|
|Calendula3,38,50||Anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant properties; stimulates angiogenesis||Potentially useful, reduced symptoms||B2|
|Catechins||Anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties||Potentially useful, reduced symptoms||C3|
|Aloe vera26||Anti-inflammatory; rich in vitamins, enzymes, minerals, sugars, and other active constituents||Not proven useful||A2|
|Chamomile3,37||Anti-inflammatory, spasmolytic, antibacterial||Not proven useful||B2|
|b-Sitosterol||Herbal formulation thought to be antibacterial with analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antiedema, and antithrombotic effects||Potentially useful||C2|
|Ascorbic acid||Antioxidant, free radical scavenging||Not proven useful||B2|
|Pantothenic acid||Antioxidant, incorporated into CoA and|
increases glutathione levels, promotes
|Not proven useful||C2|
|HA27,28,,34,54||Antioxidant, involved in epidermal moisture retention||Potentially useful||A2|
|EGF3,39,51||Stimulates proliferation of human fibroblasts and keratinocytes, promotes epithelialization||Potentially useful||C4|
|GM-CSF||Promotion of chemotaxis of monocytes into tissues, stimulating macrophage maturation and activation||Potentially useful||C3|
|Corticosteroids40-45||Anti-inflammatory; inhibits radiation-induced cytokines||Proven useful, reduced grade of RD||A1|
|Statins58||Anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, antioxidant, metabolic, and antibacterial activities||Potentially useful||A2|
|Silicone-based film or dressing35,36,46-48||Anti-inflammatory, promotes epithelialization||Potentially useful||A3|
|Trolamine49||Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory; promotes macrophages recruitment and stimulates of|
|Not proven useful||A2|
|Silver sulfadiazine53||Antimicrobial||Potentially useful||A2|
|Silver nylon dressings56||Anti-inflammatory, barrier-enhancing||Proven to be useful||A2|
|Barrier cream52||Prophylactic management||Not proven useful||A3|
|Oil-in-water emulsion55||Reduction of RD symptoms||Potentially useful||A3|
Table 5: Evidence levels of components of topical treatments
Topical agents that have common ingredients known as soothing may be beneficial for the reduction of symptoms such as niacinamide, panthenol, squalene, glycerin, and allantoin.8,13 A skincare kit including all the products needed may be easy to use for the patients supporting adherence to the regimen.8,13 A thermal water containing skincare regime (La Roche-Posay) comprising two types of cleansers, a moisturizer, a healing baume, and an SPF50+ sunscreen was shown to be beneficial for RD prevention and treatment.8 The regimen was evaluated in two-hundred-fifty-three women with mostly stage I (International Union Against Cancer (UICC) /American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)) breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy. The frequent users who daily used the total skincare regime showed significantly (p ≤ 0.0001) less severe RD than those who used parts of the skincare regimen infrequently.8
Contrary to the advice some cancer patients may receive when undergoing radiation treatment, skincare does not interfere with or increase the radiation dose to the skin and can be used in moderation before daily radiation treatments.60 Even if applied shortly before radiation treatment, thin or moderately applied skincare may have minimal influence on skin radiation dose regardless of beam energy or beam incidence.60 Patients are frequently concerned about toxic effects on the skin.60,61 Allowing patients to apply skincare throughout their radiation treatment period will simplify patient instructions and reduce patient confusion and anxiety.60,61 Allowing patients to apply skincare daily and liberally without restrictions on application timing is likely to improve patient quality of life and adherence to the prevention and management of cutaneous AEs using skincare.60-62
Topical corticosteroids (TCS) have anti-inflammatory effects and may be used for the prevention and treatment of RD.3,4,25,28,40-45,59 A meta-analysis confirmed that TCS, ranging from mild to potent, significantly prevented the incidence of wet desquamation and reduced the mean RD score.28 Various studies confirmed the efficacy of mild TCS decreasing moist desquamation, lowering the incidence of severe RD and delaying time to development of grade three RD.41-44 Extensive and inappropriate use especially of high potency TCS on the face, neck or genitalia can cause AEs including skin atrophy, permanent striae, hematomas and tearing of the skin, telangiectasia, hypertrichosis, local and systemic infections, and rarely adrenal suppression.8,13
Although the efficacy of TCS is established in RD such as in breast cancer28, it is currently under evaluation in head and neck cancer where the use of TCS is frequently associated with the onset of clinically relevant adverse events.22,42,59 In particular, the prolonged use of TCS leads to skin atrophy, which may be particularly contraindicated in this condition.59
Topical use of statins may be beneficial for RD as the product may display some anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, antioxidant, metabolic, and antibacterial properties.48
Although topical trolamine (doxepin) is extensively used for the management of RD, its efficacy for RD has not been established.49
Wound Healing Products
Wound healing products and barrier films are widely used, as well, in oncology for cracked skin, erosion, bullae and more severe RD healing by secondary intention. Depending on the wound bed condition and exudate levels, various dressings may be used, such as a foam dressing or a non-adherent wound contact layer, including silicone-coated dressings. The frequency of dressing changes depends on exudate level and are typically twice weekly. The evidence supporting the efficacy of various dressings is scarce. Silicone based agents may have anti-inflammatory properties and are available as a gel or as coated wound dressings.35,36,46-48
Prophylactic topical antibiotics should be avoided to comply with antimicrobial stewardship preventing antibiotic resistance.
The Multidisciplinary Team
Prevention and treatment of RD is a multidisciplinary effort involving radiation oncologists, dermatologists, nurses, and advanced practitioners (APPs). Collaboration and an interprofessional approach between oncology and dermatology is effective in connecting cancer patients with dermatological care from the start of their radiation treatment through to completion.8,13,63-68
Timely intervention by a radiation-oncologist or dermatologist trained in supportive dermatology for oncology patients is critical to preventing avoidable treatment interruptions.8,13,63-68 Moreover, almost equally important is an oncology specialists’ ability to improve quality of life-related to RD and may be able to preserve cancer treatment through managing RD early.8,13
Statements used and recommendations given in the algorithm were based on a mix of data and expert opinion. While it is possible that alternatives for RD could exist, the recommendations are suggestions for best practice developed from a panel of expert clinicians that are supported by peer-reviewed literature.
A small panel of physicians developed the algorithm, representing a few centers, and did not include patients in the development. Although limited evidence was available to guide the development, the project will hopefully encourage more skincare studies to prevent, treat and maintain RD.
A multidisciplinary team treating and guiding the cancer patient who receives radiation treatment may improve cancer treatment tolerance. The CaSMO algorithm on acute radiation dermatitis and general preventive measures, including cleansers and moisturizers to prevent or reduce the severity of acute radiation dermatitis, may increase awareness and help improve cancer patient outcomes.
- Canadian Cancer Society; 2021. Available at: https://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-101/cancer-statistics-at-a-glance/
- Mittmann N, Liu N, Cheng SY, et al. Health system costs for cancer medications and radiation treatment in Ontario for the 4 most common cancers: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open. 2020 Mar 16;8(1):E191-E198.
- Rosenthal A, Irailevich R, Mov R. Management of acute radiation dermatitis: A review of the literature and proposal for treatment algorithm. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Aug;81(2):558-567.
- Leventhal J, Young MR. Radiation Dermatitis: Recognition, Prevention, and Management. Oncology (Williston Park). 2017 Dec 15;31(12): 894-9.
- Biswal SG, Mehta RD. Cutaneous Adverse Reactions of Chemotherapy in Cancer Patients: A Clinicoepidemiological Study. Indian J Dermatol. Jan-Feb 2018;63(1):41-46.
- Singh M, Alavi A, Wong R, Akita S. Radiodermatitis: A Review of Our Current Understanding. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016;17(3):277-92.
- Rzepecki A, Birnbaum M, Ohri N, et al. Characterizing the Effects of Radiation Dermatitis on Quality of Life: A Prospective Survey-Based Study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Mar 13;S0190-9622(19)30425-6.
- Sauder MB, Addona M, Andriessen A, et al. The role of skin care in oncology patients. Skin Ther Letter; 2020 Oct; (Suppl):1-12.
- Chan RJ, Webster J, Chung B, et al. Prevention and treatment of acute radiation-induced skin reactions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cancer. 2014 Jan 31;14:53.
- Salvo N, Barnes E, van Draanen J, et al. Prophylaxis and management of acute radiation-induced skin reactions: a systematic review of the literature. Curr Oncol. 2010 Aug;17(4):94–112.
- Chan RJ, Larsen E, Chan P. Re-examining the evidence in radiation dermatitis management literature: an overview and a critical appraisal of systematic reviews. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 1;84(3):e357-62.
- Ferreira EB, Vasques CI, Gadia R, et al. Topical interventions to prevent acute radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):1001-1011.
- Sauder MB, Andriessen A, Claveau J, et al. Canadian skin management in oncology (CaSMO) algorithm for patients with oncology treatment-related skin toxicities. Skin Ther Letter. 2021 March; (Suppl):1-10.
- Brouwers M, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):E839-42.
- Trevelyan EG, Robinson N. Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it? Eur J Integrative Med. 2015;7(4):423-428.
- Smith Begolka W, Elston DM, Beutner KR. American Academy of Dermatology evidence-based guideline development process: responding to new challenges and establishing transparency. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Jun;64(6):e105-12.
- Canadian Cancer Society; 2021. Available at: https://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/diagnosis-and-treatment/radiation-therapy/external-radiation-therapy/?region=on
- Wei J, Meng L, Jiang X et al. Radiation induced skin reactions: mechanism and treatment. Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Dec 21;11:167-177.
- United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute(NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Bethesda, MD: nci; 2010. Ver. 5. evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/About.html;
- Trueman E. Managing radiotherapy induced skin reactions in the community. J Community Nurs. 2013;27(4):16-24.
- Bolderston A, Cashell A, McQuestion M, et al. A Canadian survey of the management of radiation-induced skin reactions. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2018 Jun;49(2):164-172.
- Iacovelli NA, Torrente Y, Sacerdote P et al. Topical treatment of radiation-induced dermatitis: current issues and potential solutions. Drugs Context. 2020 Jun 12;9:2020-4-7.
- Iacovelli NA, Galaverni M, Cavallo A, et al. Prevention and treatment of radiation-induced acute dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review. Future Oncol. 2018 Feb;14(3):291-305.
- Guenther L. Presentation at Derm. Update, Fall 2018, Montreal, Canada http://www.slideshare.net/jrcampos/03-algorithm-properties
- Wong RK, Bensadoun RJ, Boers-Doets CB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute and late radiation reactions from the MASCC Skin Toxicity Study Group. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Oct;21(10):2933-48.
- Farrugia CE, Burke ES, Haley ME, et al. The use of aloe vera in cancer radiation: An updated comprehensive review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2019 May;35:126-130.
- Cosentino D, Piro F. Hyaluronic acid for treatment of the radiation therapy side effects: a systematic review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Nov;22(21):7562-7572.
- Haruna F, Lipsett A, Marignol L. Topical Management of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anticancer Res. 2017 Oct;37(10):5343-5353.
- Russi EG, Moretto F, Rampino M, et al. Acute skin toxicity management in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy or EGFR inhibitors: Literature review and consensus. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Oct;96(1):167-82.
- McQuestion M. Evidence-based skin care management in radiation therapy: clinical update. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011 May;27(2):e1-17.
- Schnur JB, Love B, Scheckner BL, et al. A systematic review of patient-rated measures of radiodermatitis in breast cancer radiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct;34(5):529-36.
- Hegedus F, Mathew LM, Schwartz RA. Radiation dermatitis: an overview. Int J Dermatol. 2017 Sep;56(9):909-914.
- Haubner F, Ohmann E, Pohl F, et al. Wound healing after radiation therapy: review of the literature. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Sep 24;7:162.
- Presta G, Puliatti A, Bonetti L, et al. Effectiveness of hyaluronic acid gel (Jalosome soothing gel) for the treatment of radiodermatitis in a patient receiving head and neck radiotherapy associated with cetuximab: a case report and review. Int Wound J. 2019 Dec;16(6):1433-1439.
- Chan RJ, Blades R, Jones L, et al. A single-blind, randomised controlled trial of StrataXRT® – a silicone-based film-forming gel dressing for prophylaxis and management of radiation dermatitis in patients with head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct;139:72-78.
- Wooding H, Yan J, Yuan L, et al. The effect of Mepitel Film on acute radiation-induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: a feasibility study. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20170298.
- Ferreira EB, Ciol MA, Vasques CI, et al. Gel of chamomile vs. urea cream to prevent acute radiation dermatitis in patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Aug;72(8):1926-34.
- Schneider F, Danski MT, Vayego SA. Usage of Calendula officinalis in the prevention and treatment of radiodermatitis: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015 Apr;49(2):221-8.
- Kang HC, Ahn SD, Choi DH, et al. The safety and efficacy of EGF-based cream for the prevention of radiotherapy-induced skin injury: results from a multicenter observational study. Radiat Oncol J. 2014 Sep;32(3):156-62.
- Hindley A, Zain Z, Wood L, et al. Mometasone furoate cream reduces acute radiation dermatitis in patients receiving breast radiation therapy: results of a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 15;90(4):748-55.
- Ho AY, Olm-Shipman M, Zhang Z, et al. A randomized trial of mometasone furoate 0.1% to reduce high-grade acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients receiving postmastectomy radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jun 1;101(2):325-333.
- Zenda S, Yamaguchi T, Yokota T, et al. Topical steroid versus placebo for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: the study protocol of J-SUPPORT 1602 (TOPICS study), a randomized double-blinded phase 3 trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 6;18(1):873.
- Miller RC, Schwartz DJ, Sloan JA, et al. Mometasone furoate effect on acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a phase III double-blind, randomized trial from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N06C4. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Apr 1;79(5):1460-6.
- Ulff E, Maroti M, Serup J, Falkmer U. A potent steroid cream is superior to emollients in reducing acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. A randomised study of betamethasone versus two moisturizing creams. Radiother Oncol. 2013 Aug;108(2):287-92.
- Neben-Wittich MA, Atherton PJ, Schwartz DJ, et al. Comparison of provider-assessed and patient-reported outcome measures of acute skin toxicity during a Phase III trial of mometasone cream versus placebo during breast radiotherapy: the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N06C4). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 1;81(2):397-402.
- Herst PM, Bennett NC, Sutherland AE, et al. Prophylactic use of Mepitel Film prevents radiation-induced moist desquamation in an intra-patient randomised controlled clinical trial of 78 breast cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jan;110(1):137-43.
- Zhong WH, Tang QF, Hu LY, et al. Mepilex Lite dressings for managing acute radiation dermatitis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic controlled clinical trial. Med Oncol. 2013 Dec;30(4):761.
- Diggelmann KV, Zytkovicz AE, Tuaine JM, et al. Mepilex Lite dressings for the management of radiation-induced erythema: a systematic inpatient controlled clinical trial. Br J Radiol. 2010 Nov;83(995):971-8.
- Abbas H, Bensadoun RJ. Trolamine emulsion for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Jan;20(1):185-90.
- Sharp L, Finnilä K, Johansson H, et al. No differences between Calendula cream and aqueous cream in the prevention of acute radiation skin reactions–results from a randomised blinded trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Aug;17(4):429-35.
- Kong M, Hong SE. Topical use of recombinant human epidermal growth factor (EGF)-based cream to prevent radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients: a single-blind randomized preliminary study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(8):4859–4864.
- Graham PH, Plant N, Graham JL, et al. A paired, double-blind, randomized comparison of a moisturizing durable barrier cream to 10% glycerine cream in the prophylactic management of postmastectomy irradiation skin care: trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) 04.01. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 May 1;86(1):45-50.
- Hemati S, Asnaashari O, Sarvizadeh M, et al. Topical silver sulfadiazine for the prevention of acute dermatitis during irradiation for breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1613-8.
- Pinnix C, Perkins GH, Strom EA, et al. Topical hyaluronic acid vs. standard of care for the prevention of radiation dermatitis after adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer: single-blind randomized phase III clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 15;83(4):1089-94.
- Jensen JM, Gau T, Schultze J, et al. Treatment of acute radiodermatitis with an oil-in-water emulsion following radiation therapy for breast cancer: a controlled, randomized trial. Strahlenther Onkol. 2011 Jun;187(6):378-84.
- Aquino-Parsons C, Lomas S, Smith K, et al. Phase III study of silver leaf nylon dressing vs standard care for reduction of inframammary moist desquamation in patients undergoing adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2010 Dec;41(4):215-221.
- Lewis L, Carson S, Bydder S, et al. Evaluating the effects of aluminum-containing and non-aluminum containing deodorants on axillary skin toxicity during radiation therapy for breast cancer: a 3-armed randomized controlled trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 15;90(4):765-71.
- Ghasemi A, Ghashghai Z, Akbari J, et al. Topical atorvastatin 1% for prevention of skin toxicity in patients receiving radiation therapy for breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;75(2):171-178.
- Liao Y, Feng G, Dai T, et al. Randomized, self-controlled, prospective assessment of the efficacy of mometasone furoate local application in reducing acute radiation dermatitis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(52):e18230.
- Baumann BC, Verginadis II, Zeng C, et al. Assessing the validity of clinician advice that patients avoid the use of topical agents before daily radiotherapy treatments. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;4(12):1742-1748. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4292.
- Salzmann M, Marmé F, Hassel JC. Prophylaxis and management of skin toxicities. Breast Care (Basel). 2019 Apr;14(2):72-77.
- Baumann BC, Zeng C, Freedman GM, et al. Avoiding antiperspirants during breast radiation therapy: myth or sound advice? Radiother Oncol. 2017 Aug;124(2):204-207.
- Aizman L, Nelson K, Sparks AD, Friedman AJ. The influence of supportive oncodermatology interventions on patient quality of life: a cross-sectional survey. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020 May 1;19(5):477-482.
- Chen ST, Molina GE, Lo JA, et al. Dermatology consultation reduces interruption of oncologic management among hospitalized patients with immune-related adverse events. J Am Acad Dermatol. Apr;82(4):994-996.
- Barrios DM, Phillips GS, Feites-Martinez A, et al. Outpatient dermatology consultations for oncology patients with acute dermatologic adverse events impact anticancer therapy interruption: a retrospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jun;34(6):1340-1347.
- Barrios DCK, Phillips G, Lucas AS, et al. Anticancer therapy interruption and diagnostic concordance between referring clinicians and dermatologists at MSKCC. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(6): AB45
- Lucas AS, Ciccolini K. The role of oncodermatology in care of patients receiving cancer therapy. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2017 Nov;33(4):393-401.
- Kwong BY. Outcomes of Embedding Dermatologic Care Within Oncology Practices for Patients With Cancer. JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Oct 1;156(10):1051-1052.
- Zurfley F, Mostow EN. Association between the use of a physician extender and dermatology appointment wait times in Ohio. JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Dec 1;153(12):1323-1324.
- Crews J. 2019 (4). https://www.healio.com/news/hematology-oncology/20190416/telemedicine-in-oncology-virtual-solution-to-a-very-real-problem